USABILITY ANALYSIS OF INLISLITE WEBSITE IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LIBRARY IN PENAJAM DISTRICT USING HEURISTIC EVALUATION METHOD

The purpose of this study was to see to what extent the quality of the system has functioned properly so that a system is able to achieve a certain goal so that the resulting output is effective, efficient, and achieves user satisfaction at the Elementary School Library in Penajam District Using the Heuristic Evaluation Method. The type of data used consists of primary data and secondary data. The research population includes all librarians from 40 schools, namely by distributing questionnaires to all elementary school librarian employees in the North Penajam Paser sub-district with a total of 90 people. The results showed that the level of Inlislite Website Usability Analysis actually had a positive and significant effect on users of the Elementary School Library Inslite website in Penajam District. In this case, the analysis of the test was carried out using the Cronbach Alpha's method with a total of 26 questionnaire items for the X variable and 5 for the Y variable with the Cronbach Alpha value 0.928 > 0.60 for the X variable and for the Y variable the Cronbach Alpha value was 0.617 > 0.60. it means that the questionnaire is reliable or consistent for use in influential research in Inlislite Website users at Elementary School Libraries.


INTRODUCTION
The use of information systems and information technology is currently growing rapidly and is very useful to facilitate the delivery of information in companies and agencies (Tallon, Queiroz, Coltman, & Sharma, 2019). The use of information systems can meet the needs and make this information technology continue to advance in various agencies and get faster and maximum results if the use is appropriate (Bossert, 2021). Along with the development of information systems and information technology today, especially in Indonesia, supporting facilities are needed in libraries throughout Indonesia to improve performance more efficiently in operational speed (Ranggadara & Prastiawan, 2018).
The school library aims to enhance, support, enhance and pursue educational programs that meet the needs of each student and enable each student to optimize their potential (Renzulli, 2021). In addition to storing library materials, school library organizations help students and teachers cope with the task of teaching and learning by introducing school libraries (Chen & Tsai, 2012). Librarians are encouraged to start implementing library automation for problems in usability. The final result is a recommendation in the form of a user interface design according to the needs of the isoplus city run in supporting activities.
Furthermore, the research conducted by Siti Vika Ngainul Fitri in 2019 with the title "User Interface Analysis of the Banyuwangi Online Deed Website Using the Heuristic Evaluation Method". In this study, the evaluation was carried out using the Heuristic Evaluation method with Severity Ratings which was used to determine the improvement of a system in accordance with the problems found. From the results of the application of the Heuristic Evaluation method with 10 principles that have been used in this study, there are 7 principles of Heuristic Evaluation that did not find usability problems and did not require improvement, namely the principles of Visibility of System Status, Match Between System and The Real World, User Control and Freedom, Consistency and Standards, Recognition Rather Than Recall, Flexibility and Efficiency of Use, Aesthetic and Minimalist Design. Then, three principles were found that usability problems and resulted in recommendations for improvement, namely the principle of Error Prevention, Help User Recognize Dialogue and Recovers from Errors, and Help and Documentation.
The purpose of the evaluation is to see to what extent the quality of the system has functioned so that a system is able to achieve a certain goal so that the resulting output is effective, efficient, and achieves user satisfaction.

RESEARCH METHOD
The data collection method was used to obtain the data needed during the study, the method used was a questionnaire (Albuquerque, Ramos, Lucena, & Alencar, 2014). The questionnaire was used as a tool to determine the user's usability and convenience based on the principles of heuristic evaluation. Questionnaire is a technique of collecting data by distributing questions and statements to informants.
The object of this research is the Inlislite website at 40 elementary schools in Penajam District and the data were obtained from Inlislite website users at the 40 schools. The research location was Penajam District. This research was conducted for 4 months from April to July 2021 (Nashrulloh, Sulaiman, & Budiarto, 2021).
In this study, the population was librarians from 40 schools with 2 -3 librarians in each school and a total of 90 people. The population is less than 100 people, then the entire population was used as a sample, namely 90 people.
Data collection was carried out after the questionnaires had been distributed to 90 respondents who had received feedback and tested their validity for further data analysis. Data analysis is the process of testing data from the results of the questionnaire using several types of tests. Tests were carried out using the SPSS application. Based on table 1, it is known that from variable X as many as 27 statement items and questions, 1 of which is declared invalid, invalid items will be deleted or not used and 26 items are declared valid and on variable Y as many as 5 statement items are declared valid, because they have a value greater than Rtable with a significance level of 5%, which is more than 0.4438.

Reliability Test
The results of the reliability test can be seen in table 3.2 and table 3.3 with the number of questionnaire items 26 for variable X and 5 for variable Y with a Cronbach Alpha value of 0.928 > 0.60 for variable X and for variable Y the Cronbach Alpha value of 0.617 > 0.60, then from that it can be concluded that the questionnaire is reliable or consistent for use in research.  Based on the table above, it can be concluded that the number of questionnaire items is 26 for the X variable and 5 for the Y variable with a Cronbach Alpha value of 0.928 > 0.60 for the X variable and for the Y variable the Cronbach Alpha value is 0.617 > 0.60, therefore it can be concluded that the questionnaire reliable or consistent for use in research.

Normality Test
The results of the normality test used the One-Sample Kolmogorov Smirnov Test, with the basis for making decisions. It is known that the significance value is 0.200 > 0.05, so it can be concluded that the residual value is normally distributed, presented in the table as follows.

Analysis Based on Heuristic Evaluation
Based on the results of the analysis calculation based on Heuristic Evaluation as follows: a. The visibility of system status parameter in statements H1.2 and H1.3 needs improvement because the website sometimes does not respond and has to be clicked 2-4 times on the selected menu and the information on the menu still confuses some users, but overall with an average value The average category interval of 135 states that there is no need for improvement unless time is available or only cosmetic problems. b. In the match between and the real world parameter with an average value of 157 category intervals, it is stated that there is a need for improvements with low priority because the dashboard menu on the website is still not informative for users because there is no grouping of types of books such as encyclopedias, story books, textbooks and others. other. c. In the user control and freedom parameter in the H3.3 statement with the highest value among the 4 statements because the website sometimes responds according to the action of more than 5 seconds but overall with an average value of 116 category intervals stating that there is no need for repairs or cosmetic problems only. d. The consistency and standards parameter with an average value of 128 category interval states that there is no need for improvement unless there is time or cosmetic problems only because the appearance of the website is quite consistent. e. The error prevention parameter with an average value of 103 category interval states that there is no need for improvement unless there is time or cosmetic problems only, because when inputting or filling out book data in the input box, the input data can still be saved even though the inputted data does not match, for example: the year of publication box is filled with the place of publication. Therefore, the librarian must be really careful at the time of inputting. f. The recognition rather than recall parameter with an average value of 158 category interval states that there is a need for improvement with low priority because users are still confused about what to do when there is a problem with borrowing books and because of the large number of menus, it is difficult for users to remember the menus on the website. g. In the flexibility and efficiency of use parameters with an average value of 143 category intervals, it is stated that there is no need for improvement unless there is time or cosmetic problems only because according to respondents the problem is only slow loading. h. In the aesthetic and minimalist design parameters with an average value of 199, it states that the improvement is of low priority because according to respondents the menu on the website is less minimalist because of the many confusing menus for novice librarians. i. In the help user recognize, diagnose and recover from errors with an average value of 113 category intervals, it states that there is no need for repairs unless there is time or cosmetic problems only because there is no suggestion what to do if an error occurs when borrowing a book, for example: the barcode does not legible. However, the language on the website already uses everyday language, namely Indonesian and there is a back button if an error occurs. j. The help and documentation parameter with an average value of 249 category interval states that there is a need for improvement because on the website there is no help menu and guide available to help users when experiencing problems and the registration process. k. The usability parameter with an average value of 218 category interval states that there is a need for repairs with high priority because the website is not efficient enough when used, there are still many users who cannot remember all the menus on the website, the website often has errors during the book lending process and some users do not. quite satisfied when using the website. Based on table 5, the following results are obtained: a. In the visibility of system status variable, there is no heteroscedasticity problem because the significance value is 0.252 > 0.05. b. In the match between system and the real world variable, there is no heteroscedasticity problem because the significance value is 0.519 > 0.05. c. In the user control and freedom variables, there is no heteroscedasticity problem because the significance value is 0.451 > 0.05. d. In the consistency and standard status variables, there was no heteroscedasticity problem because the significance value was 0.387 > 0.05. e. In the error prevention variable, there is no heteroscedasticity problem because the significance value is 0.747 > 0.05 f. In the recognition rather than recall variable, there is no heteroscedasticity problem because the significance value is 0.787 > 0.05. g. In the flexibility and efficiency of use variable, there is no heteroscedasticity problem because the significance value is 0.706 > 0.05. h. In the aesthetic and minimalist design variables, there is no heteroscedasticity problem because the significance value is 0.910 > 0.05. i. In the help user variable, recognize, diagnose and recover from errors there is no heteroscedasticity problem because the significance value is 0.534 > 0.05.   H10, H2, H5, H8, H7, H6, H1, H9, H4, H3 Based on table 7 above on the variable visibility of system status, match between system and the real world, user control and freedom, consistency and standard, error prevention, recognition rather than recall, flexibility and efficiency of use, aesthetic and minimalist design, help user, recognize, diagnose and recover from errors, help and documentaion, there is an effect on the usability variable simultaneously because the significance value is 0.001 < 0.05 and fcount 3.504 > ftable 1.97.

T-test
The results of the F test are presented in table 8, as follows. b. In the match between system and the real world variable, there is no partial effect on the usability variable because the significance value is 0.725 > 0.05 and the tcount is 0.352 < ttable 1.99045. c. In the user control and freedom variables there is no effect on the usability variable partially because the significance value is 0.890 > 0.05 and the tcount is -0.139 < ttable 1.99045. d. In the consistency and standard variables there is no effect on the usability variable partially because the significance value is 0.777 > 0.05 and the t count is 0.284 < t table 1.99045. e. In the error prevention variable there is no effect on the usability variable partially because the significance value is 0.260 > 0.05 and the t count is 1.136 < t table 1.99045. f. In the recognition rather than recall variable, there is no partial effect on the usability variable because the significance value is 0.750 > 0.05 and the tcount is -0.320 < ttable 1.99045. g. In the flexibility and efficiency of use variable, there is no effect on the usability variable partially because the significance value is 0.925 > 0.05 and the tcount is 0.094 < ttable 1.99045. h. In the aesthetic and minimalist design variable there is no partial effect on the usability variable because the significance value is 0.673 > 0.05 and the tcount is -0.424 < ttable 1.99045. i. In the help user variable, recognize, diagnose and recover from errors there is no effect on the usability variable partially because the significance value is 0.587 > 0.05 and the tcount is 0.546 < ttable 1.99045. j. In the help and documentation variable there is no effect on the usability variable partially because the significance value is 0.978 > 0.05 and the tcount is -0.028 > ttable 1.99045.

Discussion
Based on the overall validity test analysis of the variables visibility of system status (X1), match between system and the real world (X2), user control and freedom (X3), consistency and standard (X4), error prevention (X5), recognition rather than recall (X6), flexibility and efficiency of use (X7), aesthetic and minimalist design (X8), help user, recognize, diagnose and recover from errors (X9), and help and documentation (X10) of 27 statement items and questions 26 of them are declared valid because all of their Rcount > 0, 4438 Rtable and for the Usability variable (Y1) all statements are declared valid because all Rcount > 0, 4438 Rtable.
The results of the reliability test using the Cronbach Alpha's method with 26 questionnaire items for the X variable and 5 for the Y variable with the Cronbach Alpha value 0.928 > 0.60 for the X variable and for the Y variable the Cronbach Alpha value 0.617 > 0.60 which means that the questionnaire is reliable or consistent for use in research.
Normality test aims to determine whether the data is normally distributed or not. Following are the results of the normality test using the One-Sample Kolmogorov Smirnov Test. With the basis of decision making as follows: 1. If the significance value is > 0.05, then the residual value is normally distributed 2. If the significance value is <0.05, then the residual value is not normally distributed. It is known that the results with a significance value of 0.200> 0.05, it can be concluded that the residual value is normally distributed.
Analysis based on Heuristic Evaluation obtained results with an average value of the category interval of all parameters as much as 173 which means the website is included in the repair category with low priority.
The heteroscedasticity test aims to test whether in the regression model there is an inequality of variance from the residuals of one observer to another observer [14]. The results of the heteroscedasticity test on the variable visibility of system status (X1), match between system and the real world (X2), user control and freedom (X3), consistency and standard (X4), error prevention (X5), recognition rather than recall ( X6), flexibility and efficiency of use (X7), aesthetic and minimalist design (X8), help user, recognize, diagnose and recover from errors (X9), and help and documentation (X10). 0.05.
The multicollinearity test aims to test whether the regression model found a correlation between independent variables. The results of the multicollinearity test on the variable visibility of system status (X1), match between system and the real world (X2), user control and freedom (X3), consistency and standard (X4), error prevention (X5), recognition rather than recall ( X6), flexibility and efficiency of use (X7), aesthetic and minimalist design (X8), help user, recognize, diagnose and recover from errors (X9), and help and documentation (X10) do not occur multicollinearity because all VIF values < 10 .00 and the tolerance value is > 0.10.
Furthermore, there is an F test which aims to determine whether the independent variable has a simultaneous influence on the dependent variable. Based on the results of the F test on the variable visibility of system status (X1), match between system and the real world (X2), user control and freedom (X3), consistency and standard (X4), error prevention (X5), recognition rather than recall (X6), flexibility and efficiency of use (X7), aesthetic and minimalist design (X8), help user, recognize, diagnose and recover from errors (X9), and help and documentation (X10), have an influence on usability variables (Y ) simultaneously because the significance value is 0.001 < 0.05 and fcount 3.504 > ftable 1.97.
Finally, the T test which basically shows how far the influence of one independent variable (partial) individually in explaining the variation of the dependent variable [13]. In the visibility of system status variable (X1) there is an effect on the usability variable (Y) partially because the significance value is 0.037 <0.05 and the tcount is 2.127 > table 1.99045 while for the match between system and the real world (X2) variable, user control and freedom (X3), consistency and standard (X4), error prevention (X5), recognition rather than recall (X6), flexibility and efficiency of use (X7), aesthetic and minimalist design (X8), help user, recognize, diagnose and recover from errors (X9), and help and documentation (X10) there is no effect on the usability variable (Y) partially because the entire significance value is > 0.05 and the tcount is < ttable 1.99045.

CONCLUSION
Based on the results of the research entitled "Usability Analysis of Inlislite Websites in Elementary School Libraries in Penajam District Using Heuristic Evaluation Methods", it can be concluded that: 1. In the parameters of visibility of system status, user control and freedom, consistency and standards, error prevention, flexibility and efficiency of use and help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors, it is included in the category of no need for repair / cosmetic problem only. 2. In the match between system, and the real world parameters, recognition rather than recall and aesthetic, and minimalist design are included in the category of need for improvement with low priority. 3. The help and documentation and usability parameters are included in the category of need for improvement with high priority. The visibility of system status variable has an effect on the usability variable partially because the significance value is 0.037 < 0.05 and the tcount is 2.127 > ttable 1.99045 while for other variables there is an effect on the usability variable partially.